Electro Dental Parlor v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]ndemnity actions are distinct, separate causes of action from the underlying wrong and are governed by separate statutes of limitations” and citing supporting cases from various jurisdictions in a footnote
• equitable action of indemnity is based on \`one party paying more than its fair share.'\
• \Indemnity in its most basic sense means reimbursement ... and may lie when one party discharges a liability which another should rightfully have assumed\
• “I believe at some point the law must recognize commercial practices and concepts, including the concept of bargained-for risk.”
• implied contractual indemnity rights survived RCW 4.22.040(3)’s abolition of common law indemnity between joint tortfeasors
• “Indemnity in its most basic sense means reimbursement... and may lie when one party discharges a liability which another should rightfully have assumed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).