Supreme Court of Minnesota· 4/15/1983
Electro-Craft Corp. v. Controlled Motion, Inc.
Citations
- 332 N.W.2d 890
- 220 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 811
- 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1127
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that district court findings of “trade secrets in the general ‘design procedures’ for [a] brushless motor” lacked sufficient specificity and that “[t]his lack of clarity is fatal to [plaintiff’s] claim”
- stating that under the UTSA, “[without a proven trade secret there can be no action for misappropriation, even if defendants’ actions were wrongful”
- explaining that “more than an intention” to keep something secret is required (internal quotation marks omitted)
- holding no trade secret protection where none of company's relevant documents marked as confidential
- holding no trade secret protection where none of company’s relevant documents marked as confidential
- finding a “lack of clarity” in defining trade secrets prevented the entry of an injunction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coyne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun ThanooThird Circuit· 2021-06-08· cited 377×
- Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court· 2000-04-05· cited 210×
- Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-21· cited 193×
- Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, IncorporatedFederal Circuit· 2001-06-15· cited 124×
- Amoco Production Co. v. LairdIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-21· cited 91×
- Sip-Top, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Ekco Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Ekco Housewares, Inc., a Delaware CorporationEighth Circuit· 1996-06-21· cited 74×
- Elm City Cheese Co. v. FedericoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-10-26· cited 61×
- Loftness Specialized Farm Equipment, Inc. v. TwiestmeyerEighth Circuit· 2014-02-11· cited 56×
- Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1986-11-17· cited 47×
- Cpi Card Grp., Inc. v. John Dwyer, Multi Packaging Solutions, Inc.D. Maine· 2017-12-29· cited 45×
- Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.D. Minnesota· 2013-08-09· cited 38×
- Basic American, Inc. v. ShatilaIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-12-22· cited 34×
- Micro Display Systems, Inc. v. Axtel, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1988-11-15· cited 28×
- Lexis-Nexis v. BeerD. Minnesota· 1999-03-22· cited 28×
- Thola v. HenschellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-07· cited 27×
- Bloom v. Hennepin CountyD. Minnesota· 1992-01-22· cited 24×
- Prime Therapeutics LLC v. BeattyD. Maine· 2018-11-01· cited 21×
- Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1987-09-04· cited 21×
- Religious Technology Center v. WollersheimNinth Circuit· 1986-08-08· cited 20×
- Inline Packaging, LLC v. Graphic Packaging Int'l, LLCD. Maine· 2018-09-05· cited 20×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-04-06· cited 201×
- Smith v. Dravo Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1953-05-11· cited 138×
- Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-10-13· cited 135×
- ILG Industries, Inc. v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court· 1971-06-24· cited 119×
- United Wild Rice, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-01-05· cited 91×
- The A. H. Emery Company v. Marcan Products Corporation, Marshall Control Products Corp., Hugh A. Mills, Ronald R. Marshall, and David E. GoldingSecond Circuit· 1968-01-18· cited 85×
- E. W. Bliss Company v. Struthers-Dunn, Inc., P. G. Bartlett, L. K. Clark, D. E. Henry and J. A. DingesEighth Circuit· 1969-05-02· cited 78×
- Forest Laboratories, Inc., (Cross Appellant) v. The Pillsbury Company, (Cross Appellee)Seventh Circuit· 1971-12-10· cited 77×
- Larry E. Clark v. Berkeley L. BunkerNinth Circuit· 1972-01-14· cited 75×
- Sun Dial Corp. v. RideoutSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1954-10-18· cited 68×
- E.I. Dupont Denemours & Company, Inc. v. Rolfe ChristopherFifth Circuit· 1970-08-25· cited 53×
- Jostens, Inc. v. National Computer System, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-04-23· cited 45×
- USM Corp. v. Marson Fastener Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-08-29· cited 40×
- Servo Corporation of America v. General Electric CompanyFourth Circuit· 1968-03-14· cited 39×
- Edward M. Goldberg, M.D., Cross-Appellant v. Medtronic, Inc., Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1982-08-16· cited 37×
- Henry Hope X-Ray Products, Inc. v. Marron Carrel, Inc., an Arizona Corporation and Karl UngarNinth Circuit· 1982-04-23· cited 36×
- Fowler v. Board of Supervisors of Elections of Prince Georges CountySupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 36×
- Dynamics Research Corp. v. Analytic Sciences Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-02-27· cited 35×
- Structural Dynamics Research Corp. v. Engineering Mechanics Research Corp.E.D. Michigan· 1975-09-09· cited 33×
- Kubik, Inc. v. HullMichigan Court of Appeals· 1974-11-06· cited 30×
Other cases named Electro-Craft Corp. v. Controlled Motion, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.