Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. P. A. Geier Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “instead of divided certification — perhaps equivalent to it — the judge could treat a Rule 23(b)(2) class as if it were under Rule 23(b)(3), giving notice and an opportunity to opt out on the authority of Rule 23(d)(2)” (emphasis in original)
• “instead of divided certification— perhaps equivalent to it—the judge could treat a Rule 23(b)(2) class as if it were under Rule 23(b)(3), giving notice and an opportunity to opt out on the authority of Rule 23(d)(2)” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).