Skip to main content
· 10/20/1903

Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co. v. Pittsburg Reduction Co.

Citations

  • 125 F. 926
  • 60 C.C.A. 636
  • 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an order of preclusion “is strong medicine, [but] such orders are necessary on appropriate occasion to enforce compliance with the discovery rules and maintain a credible deterrent to potential violators”
  • precluding disobedient party from offering evidence in opposition to plaintiff's alter ego claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coxe, Uacombe, Waduace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.