· 10/20/1903
Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co. v. Pittsburg Reduction Co.
Citations
- 125 F. 926
- 60 C.C.A. 636
- 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an order of preclusion “is strong medicine, [but] such orders are necessary on appropriate occasion to enforce compliance with the discovery rules and maintain a credible deterrent to potential violators”
- precluding disobedient party from offering evidence in opposition to plaintiff's alter ego claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coxe, Uacombe, Waduace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.