Skip to main content
· 12/10/2004

Electric Power Supply Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Citations

  • 391 F.3d 1255
  • 364 U.S. App. D.C. 48
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25470
  • 2004 WL 2828047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The person . . . accorded a procedural right to protect his concrete interests can assert that right without meeting all the normal standards for redressability and immediacy.\
  • hardship demonstrated where “implementation of the market monitor exemption will have a direct and immediate impact on the appellant that rises to the level of hardship.” (internal quotation marks & alteration & citations omitted)
  • “The hardship prong under the ripeness doctrine is largely irrelevant in cases . . . in which neither the agency nor the court have [sic] a significant interest in postponing review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Garland, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.