Electric City Brick Co. v. Hagler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rej ecting argument that monthly 911 surcharge was a taking because it is a user fee rather than a general tax
• 911 wireless surcharge is a tax, because \[t]he benefits flow to the general public because everyone not just wireless telephone users benefits from the enhancements to 911 service\
• 911 wireless surcharge is a tax, because “[t]he benefits flow to the general public because everyone — not just wireless telephone users — benefits from the enhancements to 911 service”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).