Eleanor Roseman v. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, at Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that it is a reasonable “initial assumption” to construe a single claim term “consistently with its appearance in other places in the same claim”
• upholding dismissal of First Amendment claim when speaker's expression \called into question the integrity of the person immediately in charge of running a department\
• \... we have concluded that plaintiff's communications fall outside the First Amendment's protection.\
• \(Teacher) Roseman's expressions were essentially private communications in which only members of the Foreign Languages Department and the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences were shown by the plaintiff to have had any interest\
• “.. . we have concluded that plaintiff’s communications fall outside the First Amendment’s protection.”
• “As Boseman’s communications were made in forums not open to the general public and concerned an issue of less public interest than Pickering’s, the First Amendment interest in their protection is correspondingly reduced”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).