Skip to main content
· 3/13/2013

Eleanor Fulgenzi v. PLIVA, Inc.

Citations

  • 711 F.3d 578
  • 2013 WL 949096
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that Buckman applies where an \element of the claim is premised on a federal-law violation\
  • noting “the logic of Buckman would encourage exclusion of evidence of federal-law violations where possible”
  • finding no impossibility preemption because the generic manufacturer could — indeed was required to — comply with its federal duty to update its labeling to match the brand-name manufacturer’s labeling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, White, McCalla

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.