Eleanor Duke v. University of Texas at El Paso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that interpreting chapter 106's predecessor to cover employment benefits would violate legislature’s intent and render superfluous other statutory provisions
• holding that interpreting chapter 106's predecessor to cover employment benefits would violate legislature's intent and render superfluous other statutory provisions
• “Ambiguities concerning the ambit of criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity.”
• Texas courts have no authority to hear certified questions from federal courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).