Eldridge v. Water Street Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Illinois courts generally do not consider issues where the outcome will not be affected, regardless of how those issues are decided
• making a similar statement about the argument raised in that case
• collateral-consequences exception applies where reversal could provide a basis for a motion in limine that would prohibit any mention of the hospitalization during the course of another proceeding
• “As a general rule, courts in Illinois do not *** render advisory opinions, or consider issues where the result will not be affected regardless of how those issues are decided.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).