Eldridge v. Trezevant
Citations
- 160 U.S. 452
- 16 S. Ct. 345
- 40 L. Ed. 490
- 1896 U.S. LEXIS 2115
Syllabus
<p>In Louisiana the constitution and laws of the State, as interpreted by its highest court, permit the taking, without compensation, of land for the construction of a public levee on the Mississippi River, on the ground that the State has, under French laws existing before its transfer to the United States, a servitude on such lands for such a purpose; and they subject a citizen of another State owning such land therein, the title to which was derived from the United States, to the operation of the state law as so interpreted. Held, that there was no error in this so long as the citizen of another State receives the same measure of right as that awarded to citizens of Louisiana in regard to their property similarly situated.</p> <p>The provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution do .not override public rights, existing in the form of servitudes or easements, which are held by the courts of a State to be valid under its Constitution and-laws.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The subject-matter of such rights and regulations falls within the control of the states . . . .\
- “The subject-matter of such rights and regulations falls within the control of the states.... ”
- “United States has no 19 20 continuing interest in the property” acquired through federal land patents
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shibas, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.