Skip to main content
· 11/28/2001

Eldridge v. INTEGRATED HEALTH SERV. INC.

Citations

  • 805 So. 2d 982
  • 2001 WL 1503363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e do not reach the issue of substantive unconscionability because [the appellant] failed to establish the necessary element of procedural un-conscionability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.