Eldridge v. Embry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff satisfied Rule 9(b
• finding identification of plaintiff's customers as a group, without individually naming them, sufficient under Rule 9(b)
• finding plaintiff's claims required Rule 9(b) particularity because defendant allegedly made false statements to plaintiff's patients and prescribers
• finding plaintiff’s claims required Rule 9(b) particularity because defendant allegedly made false statements to plaintiff’s patients and prescribers
• finding identification of plaintiff’s customers as a group, without individually naming them, sufficient under Rule 9(b)
• applying Rule 9(b) to Lanham Act claims where the claims “allege that defendants engaged in fraudulent conduct,” including by making false statements and by attempting to pass themselves off as plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).