Skip to main content
· 6/17/1891

Elder v. Greene

Citations

  • 34 S.C. 154
  • 13 S.E. 323
  • 1891 S.C. LEXIS 33

Syllabus

<p>1. Evidence — Claim and Delivery — Jurisdiction.—Defendants to this action obtained possession of plaintiff’s horse on giving a bond in their action of claim and delivery which was dismissed by the trial justice for want of jurisdiction ; and the return of the horse was ordered by the trial justice. Plaintiffs then sued defendants. If this action was for trespass, testimony was admissible to prove defendants’ title ; but if on the bond, title was not involved, and such testimony was inadmissible — not, however, upon the ground that the question of title had been settled.</p> <p>2. Claim and Delivery — Jurisdiction.—The trial justice being without jurisdiction, his order that the horse be returned was void, and a failure to return the horse was no breach of the condition of the bond which required such return when “adjudged by any competent authority.”</p> <p>3. This Case Distinguished from Cavender v. Ward, 28 S. 0., 470.</p> <p>4. Amendments. — Case remanded with leave to move for an amendment of the complaint.</p>

Judges: McIver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.