Elder v. City of Thomasville (In Re Elder)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[n]o action” by the creditor “is unacceptable; no action is action to thwart the effectiveness of the automatic stay.”
• holding that when a creditor sets the garnishment in motion, it is responsible for what happens thereafter
• asserting that “[n]o action is action to thwart the effectiveness of the automatic stay”
• asserting that “[n]o action is action to thwart the effectiveness of the automatic stay”
• determining whether city had sufficient notice within the context of a stay violation claim
• failure to dismiss or delay garnishment proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).