Elder-Keep v. Aksamit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that court was authorized to exclude unsigned affidavits in considering its summary judgment motion
• holding the trial court did not err in excluding sua sponte two unsigned, unattested “affidavits from its consideration of ... summary judgment”
• finding that 28 U.S.C. § 1746 “mandates that the affiant declare, under penalty of perjury, that the facts contained in the affidavit are true”
• stating that a “suit against a public official in his official capacity is actually a suit against the entity for which the official is an agent”
• stating that a “suit against a public official in his official capacity is actually a suit against the entity for which the official is an agent”
• stating that a “suit against a public official in his official capacity is actually a suit against the entity for which the official is an agent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).