Elcock v. Whitecotton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that inmate’s complaints of inadequate treatment of scratches and bruises would not support a claim for deliberate indifference, citing Pinkston v. Madry, 440 F.3d 879, 891 (7th Cir. 2006
• “a claim of excessive force accrues immediately and, if proved, will not undermine a finding that the plaintiff attacked or wrongly resisted a police officer or prison guard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Elcock v. Whitecotton

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Elcock v. Whitecotton
  Supreme Court· 2012-01-17
• Elcock v. Whitecotton
  Supreme Court· 2012-01-17