Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 8/2/2011

Elcock v. Whitecotton

Citations

  • 434 F. App'x 541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that inmate’s complaints of inadequate treatment of scratches and bruises would not support a claim for deliberate indifference, citing Pinkston v. Madry, 440 F.3d 879, 891 (7th Cir. 2006
  • “a claim of excessive force accrues immediately and, if proved, will not undermine a finding that the plaintiff attacked or wrongly resisted a police officer or prison guard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Elcock v. Whitecotton

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.