Skip to main content
· 1/26/2000

Elcock v. United States

Citations

  • 80 F. Supp. 2d 70
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 593
  • 2000 WL 61638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing principle of construction applicable to extradition treaties is “the preference for constructions that promote extradition”
  • recognizing double jeopardy as “a widely accepted principle of criminal justice with roots in Roman law” but also noting “there is no international consensus on its precise meaning”
  • “executive branch’s construction of a treaty, although not binding on the courts, is entitled to great weight”
  • dicta noting that, “it appears relatively clear that use of the term ‘same acts’ in a non bis in idem clause confers broader protection against extradition than a clause that uses the term ‘same offense” ’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.