Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp. v. Employers Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the insurer had a duty to defend the insured where the policy specifically stated that \advertising injury” applied to offenses committed by \infringement of copyright, title, trademark, patent or slogan”
• explaining that communications that induce doctors to prescribe certain drugs would constitute “advertising” in a non-TCPA case
• explaining in a different context that a communication intended to encourage a doctor to prescribe a drug to a patient would qualify as advertising
• defining advertising as '[a]ny oral, written, or graphic statement made by the seller in any manner in connection with the solicitation of business.'
• “[t]o fall within the coverage of the insurance policies,... there must have been some causal connection between the advertising injury and the advertising activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).