Elam v. Denney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that counsel is not ineffective for failing to present cumulative evidence supporting an expert's testimony
• observing that the \failure to present cumulative evidence does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel\ (quotation marks omitted)
• observing that the \failure to present cumulative evidence does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel\
• observing that the \failure to present cumulative evidence does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel\ (quotation marks omitted)
• observing that the \failure to present cumulative evidence does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel\
• deciding “the state courts did not unreasonably apply Strickland in concluding that counsel’s decision not to call [two experts] to provide cumulative testimony . . . was not constitutionally deficient performance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).