Skip to main content
· 7/10/1995

Elaine TRUSKOSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESPN, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 60 F.3d 74
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1190
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16888
  • 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 449
  • 1995 WL 416468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a movant “plainly did not seek relief from the judgment within a reasonable time” based on an eleven-month delay
  • holding that plaintiff’s Rule 60(b)(6) motion for reconsideration filed eighteen months after entry of judgment “plainly did not seek relief from judgment within a reasonable time”
  • holding that approximately seventeen months was not a reasonable time under Rule 60(b)(6)
  • holding that seventeen months was not a reasonable time under Rule 60(b)(6)
  • explaining that Rule 60(a) “permits only a correction for the purpose of reflecting accurately a decision that the court actually made”
  • finding that motion filed eighteen months after entry of judgment was not filed in a “reasonable time” under Rule 60(b)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Altimari, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.