Elaine Marshall v. J. Marshall, Iii

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “judges are vested with ‘inherent’ authority to transfer cases among themselves ‘for the expeditious administration of justice’” (quoting United States v. Stone, 411 F.2d 597, 598 (5th Cir. 1969) (per curiam))
• observing that preferential transfer was an act of bankruptcy under the 1898 Act
• stating the standard of review for the denial of a motion for recusal
• “The ultimate decision to confirm a reorganization plan is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
• \A '[d]ebtor bears the burden of proving that the petition was filed in 15 good faith.'\
• “[J]udges are vested with ‘inherent’ authority to transfer cases among 14 themselves ‘for the expeditious administration of justice.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).