Elaine Huffman v. Credit Union of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \we are bound by our [prior panel] decision\ concerning the meaning of state law
• explaining that “to recover under the MMPA, a consumer- purchaser need not prove. . .reliance by the plaintiff”
• finding that plaintiffs were on inquiry notice upon receipt of deficiency notices
• “to recover under the MMPA, a consumer- purchaser need not prove. . .reliance by the plaintiff”
• “[T]he five-year statute of limitations for a narrow subclass of MMPA claims—those based on allegations of ‘fraud’—may be governed by subsection (5).”
• “[T]he five-year statute of limitations for a narrow subclass of MMPA claims — those based on allegations of ‘fraud’ — may be governed by subsection (5).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).