E.L. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court's departure because of its determination that moderate-risk placement was insufficient due to the appellant's criminal history and his previous stay in such placement
• affirming the trial court’s departure because of its determination that moderate-risk placement was insufficient due to the appellant’s criminal history and his previous stay in such placement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• C.C.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-09· cited 22×
• P.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-16· cited 18×
• M.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-06· cited 4×
• PR v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-16
• CCB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-09
• MP v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-06
• EL v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-13
• H.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-02
• R.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• P.W.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-13· cited 20×
• R.G.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-05· cited 14×
• J.E.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-19· cited 12×
• P.D.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-06-23· cited 10×