Skip to main content
· 8/11/2004

El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Company and Salah El Din Ahmed Mohammed Idris v. United States

Citations

  • 378 F.3d 1346
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16547
  • 2004 WL 1780921

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1333 \grant[s] exclusive and original jurisdiction to federal district courts over civil cases in admiralty and maritime jurisdiction\
  • explaining that under 28 U.S.C. § 1333(1) the federal district courts are “grantfed] exclusive and original jurisdiction ... over civil cases in admiralty and maritime”
  • focusing on first Baker formulation in hold- ing that the Constitution, “in its text and by its structure, com- mits to the President the power to make extraterritorial enemy property designations”
  • reviewing “whether the Takings Clause reaches property owned by a nonresident alien located beyond the shores of the United States”
  • focusing on first Baker formulation in hold- ing that the Constitution, “in its text and by its structure, com- mits to the President the power to make extraterritorial enemy property designations”
  • “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Clevenger, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.