El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Pardo Ortiz, Miguel Antonio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that general statement of 27 policy must “leave [agency] officials free to consider the individual facts in the various cases that 1 arise”
• rejecting claim that the 1981 version of INS Operating Instruction 103.1(a)(1)(ii) “violated the notice-and-comment requirements of the APA, because the amended Operating Instruction qualifies under the APA’s exception for ‘general statements of policy’”
• \USCIS may ask the petitioner to provide evidence that the court had competent jurisdiction ...\
• \the officer should request that the applicant provide evidence that the court relied on the relevant state law to make the findings. This requirement can be met if the petitioner submits supplemental evidence ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).