El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Maldonado Santana, Alcidy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the absence of a federal cause of action under the Locomotive Inspection Act that would completely preempt the state tort claims of victims of a train collision
• noting that Amtrak has “the right to remove its own case under federal question jurisdiction, because it is a federal entity in which the United States owns more than 50% of the outstanding stock” (citing 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1349)
• noting the absence of a federal cause of action under the Locomotive Inspection Act that would completely preempt the state tort claims of victims of a train collision
• “[Amtrak] is a federal entity in which the United States owns more than 50% of the outstanding stock.”
• \[T]he rule of nonreviewability ... in § 1447(d) means that even remands based on an erroneous belief in the lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction cannot be reviewed....\
• “[W]e must consider whether the existence of a third-party complaint affects the court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the original action. We conclude that it does not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).