El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Lugo Cardoza, Edwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 906(c) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act is unambiguous despite disagreement between the Fifth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits about its meaning
• holding that § 906(c) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act is unambiguous notwithstanding disagreement between the Fifth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits about its meaning
• holding that § 906(c) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensa- tion Act is unambiguous notwithstanding disagreement between the Fifth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits about its meaning
• holding provision of Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act is unambiguous despite disagreement between Fifth, Ninth and Eleventh Circuits
• finding that a federal court has subject matter jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. § 634(b)(1) for Plaintiff’s claims arising under the PPP
• explaining that when Congress uses “different language” in different parts of the same statute, we normally “assume[] different meanings were intended” (quoting Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692, 711 n.9 (2004)) (internal quotation mark omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).