El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Karakozian, Roy George

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that preemption provision of Airline Deregulation Act — preempting laws “relating to rates, routes, or services” of any air carrier— should be broadly construed
• holding that state actions are not preempted if they affect rates, routes, or services “in too tenuous, remote, or peripheral a manner” (internal quotation omitted)
• deciding that State law was preempted by ADA in action brought by airlines and affirming district court’s award of injunctive and declaratory relief
• holding that specific performance was not available to a party who can sue for breach of contract
• holding that federal district court properly enjoined state attorney general from threatened enforcement of state regulations that were preempted by federal law
• concluding that a state common-law claim counts as “any law, rule, regulation, standard, or other provision having the force and effect of law” for purposes of the Airline Deregulation Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).