El Paso Natural Gas Company v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a provision that “contains only a general follow-the-law directive .... flunks SUWA!s discreteness test”
• holding that a provision that “contains only a general follow-the-law directive . . . flunks SUWA’s discreteness test”
• concluding that a plaintiff failed to state a claim because under the APA it could not rely on a broad programmatic attack
• explaining that claims under § 706(1) are viable when the allegedly withheld action is (1) \legally required\ and (2) \discrete\
• explaining that claims under § 706(1) are viable when the allegedly withheld action is (1) “legally required” and (2) “discrete”
• holding federally funded cleanup of waste contamination site did not render RCRA claims moot where the cleanup did not address groundwater contamination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).