EL DORADO LAND CO. v. City of McKinney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that inverse condemnation claims have “traditionally involved interests in real property and not the alleged taking of property interests created under contract”
• rejecting El Dorado’s argument that “it held a reversionary interest or the ‘possibility of reverter’ in the property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).