Skip to main content
· 5/13/1971

El Cortez Hotel, Inc. v. Coburn

Citations

  • 484 P.2d 1089
  • 87 Nev. 209
  • 1971 Nev. LEXIS 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an evidentiary error must be prejudicial in order to warrant reversal and remand
  • stating that an evidentiary error must be prejudicial in order to warrant reversal and remand
  • stating that an evidentiary error must be prejudicial in order to warrant reversal and remand
  • stating that an evidentiary error must be prejudicial in order to warrant reversal and remand
  • stating that an evidentiary error must be prejudicial in order to warrant reversal and remand
  • providing that although the district court's comment on counsel's closing argument was an incomplete statement of the law, reversal was not warranted when the jury was also instructed on proximate cause and told to consider all the jury instructions together

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batjer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.