El-Ali v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court was barred from considering ineffective-assistance claim 14 “A trial court abuses its discretion if no reasonable view of the record could support the trial court’s ruling.” Riley v. State, 378 S.W.3d 453, 457 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012
• stating that “trial court is barred from considering a ground raised [in a motion for new trial] outside the thirty- day period if the State properly objects”
• holding a reviewing court must defer to the trial court’s credibility determinations
• stating a defendant must show the evidence is not merely cumulative, corroborative, collateral, or impeaching
• stating a defendant must show the evidence is not merely cumulative, corroborative, collateral, or impeaching
• stating a defendant must show the evidence is not merely cumulative, corroborative, collateral, or impeaching

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).