Ekstrom v. Temple

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Act did not exempt from discovery information pertaining to compliance with JCAHO guidelines and standards since the records were not necessarily the type of materials to which the Act is applicable
• holding that the Act did not exempt from discovery information pertaining to compliance with -22- Nos. 2--07--0717 & 2--07--1272 cons. JCAHO guidelines and standards since the records were not necessarily the type of materials to which the Act is applicable
• statutory privilege barred disclosure of medical records of third-party patients even where names and identification numbers were redacted
• plaintiff not entitled to records of nonparty patients, with identification information deleted, due to physician-patient privilege
• trial court properly ordered disclosure where hospital supplied no evidence setting forth documents’ relation to medical study activities
• minutes of qualified peer-review committees are protected from discovery under the Medical Studies Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).