· 4/1/1919
Eklund v. Hackett
Citations
- 106 Wash. 287
- 179 P. 803
- 1919 Wash. LEXIS 651
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the writ was “designed for the very purpose of protecting the sovereignty from invasion or [intrusion]”
- grant of specific statutory powers does not deprive Attorney General of common law powers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.