Skip to main content
· 4/1/1919

Eklund v. Hackett

Citations

  • 106 Wash. 287
  • 179 P. 803
  • 1919 Wash. LEXIS 651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the writ was “designed for the very purpose of protecting the sovereignty from invasion or [intrusion]”
  • grant of specific statutory powers does not deprive Attorney General of common law powers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.