E.K. v. G.K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a prosecutor is granted wide latitude in the conduct of closing argument” and “is entitled to emphasize the evidence favorable to the State” (citation and punctuation omitted)
• \[T]rial counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to raise claims that would not have succeeded nor made any difference in the outcome of [the appellant's] case.\
• \[T]rial counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to raise claims that would not have ... made any difference in the outcome of [the defendant's] case.\
• “[T]rial counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to raise claims that would not have . . . made any difference in the outcome of [the defendant’s] case.”
• “Trial counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to raise claims that would not have . . . made any difference in the outcome of [the defendant’s] case.”
• “[T]rial counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to raise claims that would not have succeeded nor made any difference in the outcome of [the appellant’s] case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).