Ek v. Boggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pointing out that appellee “has not claimed that he was misled in any way by the notice of appeal”
• “a mistake in designating the judgment should not result in loss of the appeal as long as the intention to appeal from a specific judgment can be fairly inferred from the notice and the appellee is not misled by the mistake”
• reviewing vexatious litigant determination for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).