E.J.R.E. v. United States of America, T.R.E. v. United States of America, C.R. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state court decision did not qualify as a fact because it was “a ruling exclusively within the domain of the courts and is incapable of being proved or disproved”
• holding that state court decision did not qualify as a fact because it was “a ruling exclusively within the domain of the courts and is incapable of being proved or disproved”
• concluding a federal court of appeals decision is not a discoverable fact under § 2255(f)(4)
• finding that a federal court of appeals decision was not a qualify- ing fact under § 2255, ¶ 6(4)
• stating that “a decision taken from a federal court of appeals does not provide an independent basis to trigger the one-year statute of limitations provided under [§ 2255(f)(3)]”
• holding intervening change in law is insufficient to reset the statute of limitations period under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and declining to equitably toll the statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).