Eizerman v. Behn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• if the opponent to such evidence fails to request a limiting instruction, “he is deemed to have waived any objection he may have”
• “evidence *** competent for one purpose does not become incompetent because the jury might improperly consider it in some other capacity for which it could not properly be admitted”
• opponent of evidence is responsible for jury instruction confining evidence to its legitimate sphere
• opponent of evidence is responsible for jury instruction confining evidence to its legitimate sphere
• if the opponent to such evidence fails to request a limiting instruction, \he is deemed to have waived any objection he may have\
• \evidence *** competent for one purpose does not become incompetent because the jury might improperly consider it in some other capacity for which it could not properly be admitted\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).