Eizenga v. Stewart Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs’ recklessness allegations were inadequate where they simply pleaded that the defendants were “ ‘hands-on’ managers who monitored performance through detailed reports”
• holding that motive and opportunity to commit fraud is a relevant factor in establishing a strong inference of scienter, although “not sufficient in and of itself’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).