Skip to main content
· 5/15/1867

Eister v. Paul

Citations

  • 54 Pa. 196
  • 1867 Pa. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • possibility of unscrupulous use of public records not relevant in determining whether personal security exception applies
  • names and addresses of retired state employees are public records
  • list of names and addresses of retired State employees
  • names and addresses of retired State employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agnew, Prius, Read, Strong, Thompson, Woodward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.