Eiss v. Lillis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that patient’s negligent ingestion of aspirin and heart medication could not be compared with the defendant physician’s negligence
• holding that patient's negligent ingestion of aspirin and heart medication could not be compared with the defendant physician's negligence
• holding that patient’s negligent ingestion of aspirin and heart medication could not be compared with the defendant physician’s negligence
• reversing and remanding for a new trial because jury had been instructed to consider that patient had negligently taken aspirin along with heart medicine prior to the physician’s alleged negligence as evidence of contributory negligence
• the plaintiffs negligently taking aspirin along with heart medicine before the physician’s alleged negligence was not a proximate cause of the plaintiffs death

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).