Eisner v. Eisner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• it was error for the trial judge to solicit, to receive and to use as the basis of a final judgment a written communication from one party without the opposing party being served a copy of the written communication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dyson v. Dyson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-02· cited 21×
• Lee v. Lee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-09· cited 13×
• Touchstone v. Touchstone
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-13· cited 12×
• Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-03-09· cited 11×
• Harbin v. Harbin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-30· cited 9×
• Raehn v. Raehn
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-15· cited 5×
• Calhoun v. Calhoun
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-19· cited 5×
• Tomlinson v. Tomlinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-13· cited 3×
• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-21· cited 3×
• Owens v. Owens
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-03· cited 2×
• Hickok v. Hickok
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-08· cited 1×
• Meadows v. Cox
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-03
• Salisbury v. Salisbury
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-15

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• DePoorter v. DePoorter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-12· cited 42×
• Barrs v. Barrs
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-10· cited 23×
• Ashe v. Ashe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-30· cited 20×