Skip to main content
· 12/13/1995

Eisman v. Ross

Citations

  • 664 So. 2d 1128
  • 1995 WL 734237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing that portion of an award representing \attorney's time spent litigating amount of fees because there is no statutory basis for the same\ under § 57.105
  • reversing that portion of an award representing \attorney's time spent litigating amount of fees because there is no statutory basis for the same\ under section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (1993)
  • “When Rule 9.110(d) (providing for notice of appeal) was crafted, it was ‘intended that defects in the notice would not be jurisdictional or grounds for disposition unless the complaining party was substantially prejudiced.’” (quoting Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(d
  • award under subsection 57.105(1), Florida Statutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Goderich and Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.