Ninth Circuit· 12/16/1998
Eisinger v. Way (In Re Way)
Citations
- 229 B.R. 11
- 99 Daily Journal DAR 1001
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 758
- 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1735
- 33 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 979
- 1998 WL 954915
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- primary policy considerations do not exist where debtor has initiated a lawsuit against a creditor
- primary policy considerations do not exist where debtor has initiated a lawsuit against a creditor
- because a counterclaim is an independent cause of action, relief from stay must be sought to continue its prosecution
- automatic stay does not prevent a debtor or trustee from continuing to prosecute a prepetition lawsuit, nor does it prevent a defendant from defending itself in such a lawsuit
- “The primary purposes of 11 § 362 do not apply, however, to offensive actions by a debtor or 12 bankruptcy trustee, as the same policy considerations do not 13 exist where the debtor has initiated a prepetition lawsuit 14 against a creditor.”
- panel reviews questions of law de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Russell, Perris, and Meyers, Bankruptcy Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Palmdale Hills Property, LLC v. Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2011-08-03· cited 132×
- Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc. v. Palmdale Hills Property, LLC (In Re Palmdale Hills Property, LLC)Ninth Circuit· 2009-12-15· cited 29×
- Copeland v. Kandi (In Re Copeland)W.D. Washington· 2010-08-16· cited 10×
- Hi-Tech Communications Corp. v. Poughkeepsie Business Park, LLC (In Re Wheatfield Business Park, LLC)Ninth Circuit· 2004-04-02· cited 8×
- In re BennettE.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-04-07· cited 3×
- Curry v. Castillo (In Re Castillo)Ninth Circuit· 2000-04-19· cited 2×
- Stokes v. 1st American Title CompanMontana Supreme Court· 2017-11-07· cited 1×
- Stanwyck v. BeilinsonNinth Circuit· 2004-04-28· cited 1×
- In re: Censo, LLCNinth Circuit· 2022-04-05
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.