Eiserloh v. Sheen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that party waived constitutional arguments for purposes of appeal when party failed to raise those arguments during trial court proceedings
• concluding that party waived arguments for purposes of appeal when party failed to raise those arguments during trial court proceedings
• R.C. 4123.65 “does not restrict a trial court’s power to enforce a binding settlement; rather, the statute identifies the point at which a .512 settlement becomes binding (and, thus, enforceable).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).