Skip to main content
· 11/12/1958

Eisenmann v. Gould-National Batteries, Inc.

Citations

  • 169 F. Supp. 862
  • 1 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 163
  • 1958 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to amend when plaintiff filed his motion almost 20 months after the original complaint and three weeks after both parties had filed motions for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirkpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.