Skip to main content

Citations

  • 235 A.D. 123
  • 256 N.Y.S. 411
  • 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7903

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employee could not be guilty of violating commercial bribery statute because employer knew of payment and declined to stop it; employer's allowance reflected fact that payment could not have been contrary to employer's interest
  • holding that an employee could not be guilty of violating commercial bribery statute because employer knew of payment and declined to stop it; employer's allowance reflected fact that payment could not have been contrary to employer's interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.