Eisenberg v. District Attorney of County of Kings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the “mere characterization of [a] District Attorney’s prosecutorial decision making as “policy” does not remove it from the ambit of absolute immunity”
• finding that “while the [defendant] is not immune from claims for declaratory and injunctive relief, plaintiff has alleged no facts upon which this Court can grant injunctive or declarative relief in order to protect plaintiff’s civil rights” and denying leave to amend
• “[T]o the extent that [the plaintiff] has asserted claims against the [DA] in his official capacity, the claims against the [DA] are construed as claims against the state and must be dismissed as barred by the Eleventh Amendment.” (citation and footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).