Skip to main content
· 10/10/1996

Eisenach v. Eisenach

Citations

  • 41 Va. Cir. 94
  • 1996 Va. Cir. LEXIS 454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “McWhorter does not require any deferential treatment be given to a debtor; the issue [of a debtor’s full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues in the other proceedings] must only be considered by the court.”
  • “McWhorter does not require any deferential treatment be given to a debtor; the issue [of a debtor’s full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues in the other proceedings] must only be considered by the court.”
  • “McWhorter does not require any deferential treatment be given to a debtor; the issue [of a debtor’s full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues in the other proceedings] must only be considered by the court.”
  • “McWhorter does not require any deferential treatment be given to a debtor; the issue [of a debtor’s full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues in the other proceedings] must only be considered by the court.”
  • “McWhorter does not require any deferential treatment be given to a debtor; the issue [of a debtor’s full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues in the other proceedings] must only be considered by the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.